No. 487 . 18 August 2010 

ArchWeek Image
The inner half of most U.S. metropolitan areas provides many opportunities for compact, high-quality, mixed-use buildings. Appropriate location is the primary reason this kind of redevelopment can help reduce the amount of driving. Photo: Flickr user smart growth 

On 'Travel and the Built Environment'

by Kevin Matthews

News flash: The distance between a residential development location and the metropolitan center is one of the strongest factors influencing how much residents will drive.

The density of a neighborhood, in and of itself, turns out to be the weakest of the commonly considered "D" variables, key dimensions of the built environment that influence how — and how much — people move around.

These are among the key conclusions of "Travel and the Built Environment," a new meta-analysis by Reid Ewing and Robert Cervero of how land use patterns impact driving, walking, and transit use, published in June in the Journal of the American Planning Association.

Why should the people who help create our built environment care about the effects of buildings on transportation?

In general, in the United States, more walking is better for people and the environment, and more driving is worse — much worse.

It's a simple sequence of logic that makes "the potential to moderate travel demand by changing the built environment" what Ewing and Cervero call "the most heavily researched subject in urban planning."

First, we in the U.S. need to reduce our individual and collective carbon footprints by roughly four percent a year, year in and year out, for decades to come — starting immediately.

Second, buildings, their development, and their occupancy must be part of this long-term, very deep reduction in carbon footprint.   >>>



ArchitectureWeek Daily Headlines

Send this to a friend       Subscribe       Contribute       Media Kit       Privacy       Comments     Twitter     Facebook
Next Page >
© 2010 Artifice, Inc. - All Rights Reserved