Page B2.2 . 06 May 2009                     
ArchitectureWeek - Building Department
NEWS   |   DESIGN   |   BUILDING   |   DESIGN TOOLS   |   ENVIRONMENT   |   CULTURE
< Prev Page Next Page >
 
BUILDING
 
  •  
  • ASU Polytechnic Green
     
  •  
  • Self-Mass Damper at Tokyo Swatch

     

    AND MORE
      Current Contents
      Blog Center
      Book Center
      Download Center
      New Products
      Products Guide
      Classic Home
      Calendar
      Competitions
      Conferences
      Events & Exhibits
      Architecture Forum
      Architects Directory
      Library & Archive
      Web Directory
      Jobs & Marketplace
      About ArchWeek
      Search
      Subscribe & Contribute
      Newsletter Free
       

     
    QUIZ

    Self-Mass Damper at Tokyo Swatch

    continued

    Background

    In autumn of 2004, an international competition was held by Swatch Group Japan for their mixed retail and office tower in downtown Ginza, Tokyo. Subsequently, architect Shigeru Ban's unorthodox design — creating a public atrium space at the ground level, with individual glass lifts that provide direct access to the boutiques placed throughout the vertical retail space — proved victorious.

    Supporting the architect from a structural engineering front, as part of the competition submission, Arup proposed a seismic response damping system inspired by the pendulum movement of an antique clock. This paper will focus on the development of this idea, which eventually evolved to the realization of the Self-Mass Damper (SMD).

    Overview of Structure

    The key structural features of this building include: 1) creation of multiple atriums throughout the building; 2) implementation of an innovative seismic passive control system, the Self-Mass Damper (SMD) system; and 3) the sculptural undulating roof at the top level. The structural system is the outcome of an endeavor to resolve the unique spatial layout while satisfying Swatch Group's demand for a highly seismic-resistant structure.

    To summarize the overview of the structure from bottom to top: Due to the stiff soil layer located 14 meters (46 feet) below grade in the Ginza district, the building uses a raft foundation system. The existing basement structure was hollowed out and the basement walls used for temporary shoring.

    Numerous openings were required at the ground level to accommodate nine elevators, two stairwells, and a car lift to access the parking spaces, leaving very little floor plate area left to transfer the lateral forces into the surrounding basement walls. To resolve this force transmission, the ground level slabs were reinforced with steel plates of six to 12 millimeters (0.24 to 0.47 inches) thick.

    From the ground level, a three-story retail atrium extends through the longitudinal direction of the building — effectively carving away the much-needed moment frames at the base of the structure. To reinforce the lateral stability of these bottom few levels, three sets of core framing were introduced into the system.

    The general superstructure system consists of a rigid steel moment frame placed at every 2.4 meters (7.9 feet) along the longitudinal direction. To counter the seismic response of the building, SMD systems were located at floors 9, 10, 12 and 13.

    In contrast to the box shape of the building, architect Shigeru Ban envisaged a light, free-form roof floating above the structure. The geometry of this roof was determined by a series of form-finding techniques available in GSA, software developed by the research and development division of Arup. In accordance with the architect's image of a woven object, the structural scheme consisted of a pair of stacked steel plates extending in three directions.

    Requirements for Seismic Resistance

    According to Japan Structural Consultants Association (JSCA) performance-based design practices in Japan, the structural design grades for seismic resistance are grouped into three categories: Standard Grade, High Grade, and Special Grade.

    While minimum code requirements stipulate Standard Grade, through numerous discussions during the schematic design stage, it became apparent that Swatch Group wished to target an onerous Special Grade structure with additional requirements of: 1) main structural elements to remain elastic under Level 2 (500-year return period) seismic event, and 2) life safety under Level 3 (1,000-year return period) seismic event.

    In order to achieve such targets with economic feasibility, it was determined that implementation of a damping system to reduce the seismic response would be essential. Subsequently, the design team commenced a thorough exploration of damping systems that would best fit the structure without imposing upon the architectural intent.

    At the onset of design, a pendulum-type mass damper system was proposed. While an interesting concept, we had to convince ourselves that such a system would be appropriate and effective for this building. Armed with a plethora of damping devices available in Japan, the design team began investigating the effectiveness and pros and cons of various systems.

    To achieve a Special Grade structure with additional stringent design targets, it is common practice that a base-isolated scheme would be the system of choice. However, since the plot of land in the Ginza district is one of the most costly in the world, allocating a +1.0-meter- (3.3-foot-) wide strip of clearance around the perimeter of the building to absorb the base-isolation movement was deemed inappropriate.

    Installation of hysteretic or viscous damping devices within the allowable three core frames was studied, but resulted in mediocre effectiveness due to the bending deformation shape of the slender core frames.

    Preliminary studies indicated that a mass-damper-type system — although dependent upon the mobilized mass amount and tuning of the system — had potential to be extremely effective for this slender building

    Evolution of the Mass-Damper Scheme

    The key point in using a mass damper system to deal with large seismic forces, unlike the types of systems used to control low-energy wind responses, is that a tremendous amount of mass must be mobilized in order to be effective.

    Characteristically, the mass damper begins exhibiting practical effectiveness at around five-percent mobilization of the building mass. As the mobilized mass is further increased, the system can be more appropriately categorized as a mid-level isolation system, and finally, when mobilized mass is 100 percent of the building mass, it becomes a base-isolated structure.   >>>

    Discuss this article in the Architecture Forum...

     

    Continue...

    ArchWeek Image

    The high-damping rubber bearing developed for the self-mass damper system was tested several times, and devices were installed in the building to measure performance during a seismic event.
    Photo: Courtesy Arup Extra Large Image

    ArchWeek Image
    SUBSCRIPTION SAMPLE

    The Hayek Center's 13 stories are grouped into multistory bays by a rigid superstructure.
    Photo: Daichi Ano Extra Large Image

    ArchWeek Image

    Arup developed the self-mass damper (SMD) system of passive seismic control for the Hayek Center, a slender building with retractable exterior walls and several multistory atriums.
    Photo: Daichi Ano Extra Large Image

    ArchWeek Image

    Hayek Center longitudinal section drawing.
    Image: Shigeru Ban Architects Extra Large Image

    ArchWeek Image

    Diagrammatic structural cross-section drawing showing SMD floors in red.
    Image: Courtesy Arup Extra Large Image

    ArchWeek Image

    Detail section drawings of the high-damping rubber bearing (above) and the slider bearing (below) found between the SMD floors and the corbels attached to the superstructure.
    Image: Courtesy Arup

    ArchWeek Image

    Japan Structural Consultants Association (JSCA) Seismic Performance Grades.
    Image: Courtesy Arup

    ArchWeek Image
    SUBSCRIPTION SAMPLE

    The self-mass damper floor plates are effectively isolated laterally with special spring and damper devices connecting the floors to the main structure.
    Photo: Daichi Ano Extra Large Image

     

    Click on thumbnail images
    to view full-size pictures.

     
    < Prev Page Next Page > Send this to a friend       Subscribe       Contribute       Media Kit       Privacy       Comments
    ARCHWEEK  |  GREAT BUILDINGS  |  ARCHIPLANET  |  DISCUSSION  |  BOOKS  |  FREE 3D  |  SEARCH
      ArchitectureWeek.com © 2009 Artifice, Inc. - All Rights Reserved