Page B2.2 . 13 February 2008                     
ArchitectureWeek - Building Department
NEWS   |   DESIGN   |   BUILDING   |   DESIGN TOOLS   |   ENVIRONMENT   |   CULTURE
< Prev Page Next Page >
 
BUILDING
 
  •  
  • Gateshead Millennium Bridge
     
  •  
  • To Cross the Seine
     
  •  
  • Tacoma Narrows Number Three
     
  •  
  • Architectural Weaving
     
  •  
  • LEED Gold Resurrection

     

    AND MORE
      Current Contents
      Blog Center
      Book Center
      Download Center
      New Products
      Products Guide
      Classic Home
      Calendar
      Competitions
      Conferences
      Events & Exhibits
      Architecture Forum
      Architects Directory
      Library & Archive
      Web Directory
      Jobs & Marketplace
      About ArchWeek
      Search
      Subscribe & Contribute
      Newsletter Free
       

     
    QUIZ

    To Cross the Seine

    continued

    Truss Performance

    The two parallel vertical truss planes are spaced 16 feet (5 meters) apart, creating inside and outside volumes, placing half the pedestrian surfaces outside the structure, for unobstructed views. This configuration makes the bridge quite slender transversely, but it is stiffened by the continuity through the lateral spans.

    The shear strength of the truss is provided by the parabolic geometry of the booms for uniform loads, and by the radiating obelisks for partial loads. The compliant bending stiffness of the elements provides shear stiffness without compromising the differentiation of the tension and compression booms. The deflections of the apparently slender structural depth are controlled by the moment continuity at the supports.

    This truss system was invented for the specific context of the Paris Seine landscape. The structure is intentionally flexible, and reacts pleasantly to the wind and pedestrian movement. Tuned mass dampers control the accelerations for safety and comfort. The deck has intentional porosity to avoid the unusual Scanlan coefficients which are characteristic of this topology in section.

    The main span across the river is 620 feet (190 meters); a shorter span on each end crosses the quayside roads. At the abutments, a pair of mannerist-style, slotted, vertical tension plates and bilinear struts transfer forces from the truss to the foundations.

    Anchoring the Ends

    The foundations are reinforced concrete anchored in the underlying limestone. Prestressed ground anchors are incorporated into a design that allows visual inspections and will facilitate eventual replacement.

    The foundations were poured near the quay at each end of the bridge. A compact milling machine was used because of the poor bearing capacity and the limited access to the lower quay level.

    The cut passed through the river sediment down into the limestone below. The cut was stabilized with thixotropic bentonite mud. Steel reinforcing cages were lowered into the mud, and the concrete was poured though a tube to the bottom.

    The steel cables that precompress the tension foundation were cemented into steel tubes, which were themselves cemented into individual holes bored through the limestone. This foundation system was permanently equipped with devices to measure stresses over time.

    The main tension plates of the superstructure were anchored on a hammer head, which applies a compression force to the back of the concrete ground beams. The hammer head was the first part of the steel superstructure to be delivered to the site so the concrete substructure could be cast around it. The jacks, at the steel/ concrete interface, were used to fine-tune the altitude of the center of the bridge, compensating for slight movements of the foundations and the fabrication tolerances.

    Prefabricated steel castings were used where different laminated steel sections met at nodes, at the crossing of the compression and tension booms, and in the changes in direction of the transformer. The occasional defects that can arise in both the welding and casting processes were identified by ultrasonic and X-ray testing, and in critical locations they were cut out and repaired.

    Fabricating the Components

    The fabrication of the steel structure was carried out in workshops in the cities of Lauterbourg Nantes and Charleville-Mézières. Lengths of laminated steel and different shapes of cast steel were assembled by manual and semiautomatic welding.   >>>

    Discuss this article in the Architecture Forum...

     

    Continue...

    ArchWeek Image
    SUBSCRIPTION SAMPLE

    The footbridge "Passerelle Simone de Beauvoir," by RFR and Feichtinger Architectes, crosses the Seine in Paris.
    Photo: RFR

    ArchWeek Image

    The central truss being delivered by barge.
    Photo: RFR

    ArchWeek Image

    Differently curving walkways.
    Photo: RFR

    ArchWeek Image

    Sheltered area mid-span.
    Photo: RFR

    ArchWeek Image

    Longitudinal section.
    Image: Feichtinger Architectes Extra Large Image Extra Large Image

    ArchWeek Image

    Cross section through the truss.
    Image: Feichtinger Architectes Extra Large Image Extra Large Image

    ArchWeek Image

    The walkway decks curve up and down.
    Photo: RFR

    ArchWeek Image

    One of the side decks.
    Photo: RFR

     

    Click on thumbnail images
    to view full-size pictures.

     
    < Prev Page Next Page > Send this to a friend       Subscribe       Contribute       Media Kit       Privacy       Comments
    ARCHWEEK  |  GREAT BUILDINGS  |  ARCHIPLANET  |  DISCUSSION  |  BOOKS  |  FREE 3D  |  SEARCH
      ArchitectureWeek.com © 2008 Artifice, Inc. - All Rights Reserved