Page B1.1 . 02 March 2005                     
ArchitectureWeek - Building Department
NEWS   |   DESIGN   |   BUILDING   |   DESIGN TOOLS   |   ENVIRONMENT   |   CULTURE
< Prev Page Next Page >
 
BUILDING
 
  •  
  • Taiwan On Top
     
  •  
  • Antarctic Architecture
     
  •  
  • A Better Suburbia

     
    Nana Wall

    AND MORE
      Current Contents
      People & Places
      Blog Center
      Book Center
      Download Center
      New Products
      Products Guide
      Classic Home
      Calendar
      Competitions
      Conferences
      Events & Exhibits
      Architecture Forum
      Architects Directory
      Topics Library
      Complete Archive
      Web Directory
      About ArchWeek
      Search
      Subscribe & Contribute
      Free Newsletters
       

     
    QUIZ

    Taiwan On Top

    by Ian Morley

    The official opening of the Taipei 101 Tower in December 2004, makes it for now the world's tallest building. In the 20th century, competition for this title was largely waged in Chicago and New York, but it has recently migrated to Asia.

    Hong Kong, Shanghai, Kuala Lumpur, and now Taipei, Taiwan, all have modern mega-structures, and more are planned in India and China. So why are Asian countries building so high just when the United States and Europe are backing off from the competition?

    The many answers to this question include pride, the explicit display of national development, prosperity, ambition, and the eagerness to create new national landmarks. Of importance too is the hope that the prestige will stimulate both domestic and foreign attention, putting less developed capitalist nations firmly into the international limelight.

    Formed by Traditional Values

    Furthermore, there's a difference in cultural perception between Westerners, who may respect the sheer scale of tall buildings, and Asians, for whom tall buildings symbolize the future and the notion of climbing to see further. Super-structures thus often have a symbolic value in Asia that may extend beyond commercial sense.

    The 1,667-foot- (508-meter-) high 101 Tower, for instance, is built in an economic climate with relatively slow corporate spending. And leasing space in the tower will be many times more expensive than in other parts of the city where empty space is abundant. Given present economic risks and the memory of attacks in New York, are multinational companies eager to move into tall towers?   >>>

    Discuss this article in the Architecture Forum...

    Continue...

    ArchWeek Image

    The Taipei 101 Tower in its urban context, as seen from the top of the ShinKong Tower, Taipei's second largest building.
    Photo: Ian Morley

    ArchWeek Image

    Taipei 101 Tower, the world's tallest building, by C.Y. Lee and Partners.
    Photo: Ian Morley

     

    Click on thumbnail images
    to view full-size pictures.

     
    < Prev Page Next Page > Send this to a friend       Subscribe       Contribute       Media Kit       Privacy       Comments
    ARCHWEEK   |   GREAT BUILDINGS   |   DISCUSSION   |   NEW BOOKS   |   FREE 3D   |   SEARCH
      ArchitectureWeek.com © 2005 Artifice, Inc. - All Rights Reserved