document.writeln("<table><tr><!-- Tools Story INTRO --><td align=left valign=top width=25%><a href=http://www.ArchitectureWeek.com/2004/0303/tools_1-1.html><img src=http://www.ArchitectureWeek.com/2004/0303/images/12379_image_1.150.jpg width=150 height=150 border=0 alt='ArchWeek Image'></a></td><td align=left valign=top width=75%><p style='text-align: left'><a href=http://www.ArchitectureWeek.com/2004/0303/tools_1-1.html><font size=+0 face=Helvetica,Arial color=#000000>MODELING LIBESKIND'S WTC</font></a></p><p style='text-align: left'>Like other contemporary architects, <a href='http://www.greatbuildings.com/architects/Daniel_Libeskind.html'>Daniel Libeskind</a> — designer of the new <a href='http://www.greatbuildings.com/buildings/World_Trade_Center.html'>World Trade Center</a> — and his firm use computer-aided modeling tools extensively during schematic design. But the firm also relies on physical models. As the new World Trade Center design develops in the public limelight, a look back at its schematic beginnings reveals a process in which physical and computer models evolved in parallel.</p><p style='text-align: right'><a href=http://www.ArchitectureWeek.com/2004/0303/tools_1-1.html><img src=http://www.ArchitectureWeek.com/images/continue.gif width=96 height=22 border=0 alt=Continue...></a></p></td></tr></table>");
