document.writeln("<table><tr><!-- News Story INTRO --><td align=left valign=top width=25%><a href=http://www.ArchitectureWeek.com/2003/0827/news_1-1.html><img src=http://www.ArchitectureWeek.com/2003/0827/images/12084_image_1.150.jpg width=150 height=150 border=0 alt='ArchWeek Image'></a></td><td align=left valign=top width=75%><p style='text-align: left'><a href=http://www.ArchitectureWeek.com/2003/0827/news_1-1.html><font size=+0 face=Helvetica,Arial color=#000000>RECONSTRUCTION COMPLICATIONS CONTINUE</font></a></p><p style='text-align: left'>When architect <a href='http://www.greatbuildings.com/architects/Daniel_Libeskind.html'>Daniel Libeskind</a> was chosen in February 2003 to redesign New York's <a href='http://www.greatbuildings.com/buildings/World_Trade_Center.html'>World Trade Center</a> site, it appeared to be an irrevocable decision about the fate of 'Ground Zero.' But controversies have persisted, and what finally gets built may be very different from Libeskind's original design vision.</p><p style='text-align: right'><a href=http://www.ArchitectureWeek.com/2003/0827/news_1-1.html><img src=http://www.ArchitectureWeek.com/images/continue.gif width=96 height=22 border=0 alt=Continue...></a></p></td></tr></table>");
