document.writeln("<table><tr><!-- News Story INTRO --><td align=left valign=top width=25%><a href=http://www.ArchitectureWeek.com/2003/0305/news_1-1.html><img src=http://www.ArchitectureWeek.com/2003/0305/images/12084_image_1.150.jpg width=150 height=150 border=0 alt='ArchWeek Image'></a></td><td align=left valign=top width=75%><p style='text-align: left'><a href=http://www.ArchitectureWeek.com/2003/0305/news_1-1.html><font size=+0 face=Helvetica,Arial color=#000000>LIBESKIND SCHEME CHOSEN FOR WTC</font></a></p><p style='text-align: left'>On February 27, 2003, the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation (LMDC) selected <a href='http://www.greatbuildings.com/architects/Daniel_Libeskind.html'>Studio Daniel Libeskind</a> and their widely-applauded design to guide the reconstruction of the <a href='http://www.greatbuildings.com/buildings/World_Trade_Center.html'>World Trade Center</a> site in New York. The '<a href='/cgi-bin/wlk?http://www.renewnyc.com/plan_des_dev/wtc_site/new_design_plans/selected_libeskind/default.asp'>Memory Foundations</a>' submission by the Polish-American architect emerged from a competition lasting many months, involving some of the best known architects in the world, and inspiring a lively, often rancorous, public debate. Although the debating is far from over, there now appears to be a framework from which to develop a long-term reconstruction plan.</p><p style='text-align: right'><a href=http://www.ArchitectureWeek.com/2003/0305/news_1-1.html><img src=http://www.ArchitectureWeek.com/images/continue.gif width=96 height=22 border=0 alt=Continue...></a></p></td></tr></table>");
