Page C4.2 . 14 February 2001                     
ArchitectureWeek - Culture Department
NEWS   |   DESIGN   |   BUILDING   |   DESIGN TOOLS   |   BUILDING CULTURE
CULTURE
 
  •  
  • Online Trip to the Taj Mahal
     
  •  
  • The Theaters of Hardy Holzman Pfeiffer Associates
     
  •  
  • Postcard from East Kazakhstan
     
  •  
  • Saving Wright's Gordon House
     
  •  
  • Just Another Pretty Web Site?

     
    AND MORE
      Current Contents
      Blog Center
      Download Center
      New Products
      Products Guide
      Classic Home
      Architecture Forum
      Architects Directory
      Topics Library
      Complete Archive
      Web Directory
      About ArchWeek
      Search
      Subscribe & Contribute
      Free Newsletters
       

     
    QUIZ

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

    Saving Wright's Gordon House

    (continued)

    He explains: "You go in through a small, constricted opening with a low ceiling and transition into a dramatic high-ceiling area. You always have a sense of moving through a sequence of different-scaled spaces. Frank Lloyd Wright's Usonian houses are of a scale that you can live in."

    Staehli notes that Wright was especially known for using wood and masonry for their color, their texture, their warmth. "A lot of the Northwest Style architects like Walter Gordon and Pietro Belluschi did that too," he says. "People here like to be able to look out the window to the trees, but also to have a cozy feel on the inside. With the little nook around the fireplace you have an intimate area where you can settle in."

    Sad Commentary on Modern American Housing

    Since its completion in 1964, the Gordon House has occupied 22 acres (9 hectares) of pristine farmland along the Willamette River. Ever since the Gordons died a few years ago, however, the house has sat in dilapidated limbo.

    Anticipating inclusion in Portland's urban growth boundary, the Gordons' son demanded a sky-high price for its subdivision-ready acreage. When that hope fizzled, he sold the property to an affluent Wilsonville couple who, oblivious to Wright's legacy, coveted the property for a new "McMansion."

    Dave and Carey Smith's demolition request inspired widespread outrage, which ultimately led to the house being spared. But it wasn't architectural benevolence that made them donate the house to the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy. The Smiths simply wanted it gone, and free removal was cheaper than paying to demolish it themselves.

    Of course this begs the question: Why tear down a Frank Lloyd Wright house only to build a lesser home in its place? For many homebuyers, especially rich ones, size matters--to the extent that extraordinary architecture in its path can be bulldozed.

    A few years ago, a house designed by Belluschi, Portland's most legendary architect, was demolished for this reason, as was another by fellow Northwest Style practitioner John Yeon. Sadly, these houses have gone the way of the dinosaur because they weren't big enough trophies.

    Will We Learn the Lesson?

    As the Gordon House goes from house to museum, let its memory serve as a reminder not only to architects and builders, but also to those hiring them. With its urban growth boundary and progressive planning, Portland is ahead of the curve in city design. But as thousands move here each month, we continue to build banal, monstrous houses within our ever-denser city limits.

    "We're losing landmarks monthly throughout the state," Staehli observes. "A little bit goes here, a little bit there, and first thing you know you've lost the integrity of the land. This wasn't one of Wright's major buildings, but in the context of surviving Usonian homes it's very important. And it's definitely the only work of its kind in Oregon."

    "Everybody says that they prefer craftsmanship over size," says David Giulietti, one of Portland's leading residential architects and former president of the local American Institute of Architects chapter. "But usually in the end it's a 4-5,000-square-foot (360-450-square-meter) house that they wind up asking for."

    Still, Giulietti says that as energy costs rise and more baby boomer parents face empty nests, his clients are slowly learning there's a better way.

    If so, maybe our next architectural wonder can remain more than a museum piece. Wright proved a home's quality can--and should--be measured in workmanship and design, not square footage. His time is long gone, but the message is more vital than ever.

    Brian Libby is a freelance writer and former communications director for the Portland chapter of the American Institute of Architects.

    A version of this article first appeared in the January 24, 2001 issue of Willamette Week.

     

    AW

    ArchWeek Photo

    Looking out from the story-and-a-half living area, seldom found except in much larger houses.
    Photo: Brian Libby

    ArchWeek Photo

    The second-floor hallway connects the two upstairs bedrooms.
    Photo: Brian Libby

    ArchWeek Photo

    Gordon House entry.
    Photo: Brian Libby

    ArchWeek Photo

    Patterns of light and shadow are created by plywood screens and clerestory windows sequencing light and dark.
    Photo: Brian Libby

    ArchWeek Photo

    The Gordon House, showing signs of age and neglect, will soon move to a new location and become a museum.
    Photo: Brian Libby

     

    Click on thumbnail images
    to view full-size pictures.

     
    < Prev Page Next Page > Send this to a friend       Subscribe       Contribute       Advertise       Privacy       Comments
    GREAT BUILDINGS   |   DISCUSSION   |   SCRAPBOOK   |   COMMUNITY   |   BOOKS   |   FREE 3D   |   ARTIFICE   |   SEARCH
      ArchitectureWeek.com © 2001 Artifice, Inc. - All Rights Reserved